MINING WITHOUT A MAP: TEXT-AND-DATA-MINING, AI TRAINING, AND THE LIMITS OF FAIR DEALING UNDER INDIAN COPYRIGHT LAW AFTER ANI V. OPEN AI

Authors

  • Juney Reena Chacko Research Scholar, Department of Law, CALSAR, University of Kerala, India. Author
  • Dr. Malavika J Assistant Professor, Department of Law, The Kerala Law Academy Law College, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65785/j3xb2811

Abstract

The development of large language models relies extensively on text obtained from the open internet, much of which is copyright-protected and may be incorporated into training datasets without authors’ consent or remuneration. The resulting question is whether such text-and-data mining (TDM) constitutes copyright infringement or falls within an existing statutory exception. India first received substantial judicial treatment of this issue in Asian News International v OpenAI, decided by the Delhi High Court on 24 July 2026 at the interim stage. The Court held, prima facie, that the storage and use of ANI’s literary works for training the large language models underlying ChatGPT satisfied the purpose and fairness requirements of section 52(1)(a). This paper critically examines that reasoning and argues that the decision demonstrates both the adaptability and limits of India’s fair-dealing framework. Although section 52 does not establish the open-ended fair-use doctrine found in the United States, the Court broadly interpreted “research”. It developed a distinct fairness inquiry to accommodate AI training. The paper contends that this approach provides an immediate judicial response but leaves unresolved questions concerning the scale of AI training, market substitution, lawful access, and the institutional limits of judicial adaptation. A comparison with the European Union, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States demonstrates materially different approaches to reconciling TDM with copyright. Against this background, the paper evaluates the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) licensing model and argues that a remunerated legislative framework may offer a more durable solution than relying exclusively on case-by-case judicial development of section 52.

Keywords: Text-and-Data Mining (TDM), Fair Dealing, Section 52, Artificial Intelligence Training, Statutory Licensing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Sobel BLW. Artificial Intelligence’s Fair Use Crisis. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts. 2017;41:45–48.

2. Copyright Act 1957 (India).

3. ANI Media Pvt Ltd v OpenAI OpCo LLC. CS(COMM) 1028/2024, 2026:DHC:5900 (Del HC July 24, 2026).

4. 17 U.S.C. § 107 (United States).

5. Syndicate of the Press of the University of Cambridge v BD Bhandari. 185 (2011) DLT 346 (Del).

6. Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012 (India).

7. Banyan Tree Holding (P) Ltd v A Murali Krishna Reddy. (2009) 42 PTC 361 (Del).

8. World Wrestling Entertainment Inc v M/S Reshma Collection. 2014 SCC OnLine Del 2031.

9. Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market. [2019] OJ L130/92.

10. Copyright Act 1970 (Japan), Act No 48 of 1970, as amended by Act No 30 of 2018, art 30-4.

11. Bartz v Anthropic PBC. 787 F Supp 3d 1007 (ND Cal 2025).

12. Kadrey v Meta Platforms Inc. 788 F Supp 3d 1026 (ND Cal 2025).

13. Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH v Ross Intelligence Inc. 765 F Supp 3d 382 (D Del 2025).

14. Authors Guild v Google Inc. 804 F3d 202 (2d Cir 2015).

15. Authors Guild v HathiTrust. 755 F3d 87 (2d Cir 2014).

16. Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc v Goldsmith. 598 US 508 (2023).

17. Rameshwari Photocopy Services v University of Delhi. 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6229.

18. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, c. 48, § 29A (UK).

19. Intellectual Property Office. Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Copyright and Patents—Government Response to Consultation. June 28, 2022.

20. Intellectual Property Office. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence. CP 1205. December 2024.

21. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Department for Culture, Media and Sport & Intellectual Property Office. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence: Statement of Progress under Section 137 Data (Use and Access) Act. December 2025.

22. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Department for Culture, Media and Sport & Intellectual Property Office. Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence. March 2026. ISBN 978-1-5286-6308-3.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

MINING WITHOUT A MAP: TEXT-AND-DATA-MINING, AI TRAINING, AND THE LIMITS OF FAIR DEALING UNDER INDIAN COPYRIGHT LAW AFTER ANI V. OPEN AI. (2026). Aviradha International Journal of Law and Legal Studies (AIJLLS), 2(3), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.65785/j3xb2811